Search - Explorers Club :: Raising the Mammoth

Raising the Mammoth
Explorers Club
Raising the Mammoth
Genres: Pop, Rock, Metal
 
  •  Track Listings (3) - Disc #1


     
?

Larger Image

CD Details

All Artists: Explorers Club
Title: Raising the Mammoth
Members Wishing: 6
Total Copies: 0
Label: Magna Carta
Original Release Date: 1/1/2000
Re-Release Date: 8/20/2002
Genres: Pop, Rock, Metal
Styles: Progressive, Progressive Rock
Number of Discs: 1
SwapaCD Credits: 1
UPCs: 026245904620, 111105904626, 766489194424

Similarly Requested CDs

 

CD Reviews

Elephant Music
Phil Mackenzie | 09/09/2002
(3 out of 5 stars)

"Some great moments with some obvious b.s. intermingled, once again courtesy of Trent Gardner's unique, eccentric vision of progressive rock.The two songs with Steve Walsh are the highlights, and are fairly well put together (minimum intermingled b.s.). Walsh was a perfect fit for the two songs he sings on, and for this reason I would recommend fans of his to get this cd. Terry Bozzio also stands out on drums. This format allows him to go all out, and everything he does is pretty amazing. Mark Robertson plays some good solos on keys. I liked James Labrie's vocal spots, but why in the world is Trent's voice jumping in and stealing a few lines (he does this in one of the Walsh songs too) ? Trent's voice sounds good on the Magellan albums, but why splice it in here and deny the full effect of listening a great vocalist for the entire song ?Referring to a track as 'aka: Prog-o-matic' betrays a certain not-to-be-taken-seriously attitude, in my opinion, which damages the credibility of the composer. Hey, Trent, why do you feel you have to throw us bones ?There is a certain brooding character that runs throughout the whole album (musically and lyrically), tying it all together. The synth textures used for the melodies, effects and orchestral-like bits even evoke the mystery and imagery of the mammoth concept. Very clever.Regarding sound quality, this album suffers from way too much compression on the individual tracks, and overall too. It exhibits the same tinny, boxed-in, no-air timbre that is reminiscent to other recent Magna Carta releases. Magna Carta would do well to pair Trent with a competent producer next time out, or at least try another mastering engineer.In summary, there is enough here to recommend to the curious. But there's probably a good 10-12 minutes of material that should have been edited out. Would have made a much more powerful and cohesive album, in my opinion. But Trent has to throw bones to the dogs, I guess."
Several billion albums in one
Phil Mackenzie | Toronto, Canada | 09/03/2006
(5 out of 5 stars)

"When I saw that four songs were divided into fourty-four tracks and that the four songs were supposed to represent one larger song, my first thought was naturally "oh no, this will be Tales From Topographic Oceans on really bad heavy metal poisoning". The four "songs" are a little bit choppy at parts, which really distracts the listener at points, and again, I was thinking "ah, the price of unrealized ambition", but the compositions were strong, and the last "song" Giantiphicus is breathtaking.

Years after forgetting that I owned the album, I thought "well, if this is all one song, then I can just press "shuffle" and get an album of some kind". I think I get the album's point now. This is just one lineup of over a billion possible outcomes (44*43*42*...etc). There will still be "song divisions", owing to the fadeout finish of the "Broad Decay" suite and other obvious starting/finishing points, but the results are incredibly interesting.

I have done this three times, and gotten three completely different albums. Because I already know where parts are "supposed" to be, its also amusing in a way. Unsurprisingly, the results can be choppy, but the moments that flow seemlessly will leave you in progmazement.

I'm not 100% convinced that Trent Gardiner intended the listener to hear the same album each time. And if he did, and had no disire for a "shuffle fest", then he has unintentionally created one of the funnest prog-in-a-box toys ever."
Interesting, but missing something
Phil Mackenzie | 03/11/2003
(4 out of 5 stars)

"I had some high expectations from this album after hearing the last one. Left me a bit dissapointed. I'm not sure what the problem was,but after listening to it twice I was already getting tired of it. Still not bad or anything, but I've known these people to come up with music that's way better than anything in this album. Oh and what's the deal with splitting up the tracks into tiny bits anyway??"