Search - Billy J Kramer & The Dakotas :: Abbey Road 1963-1966

Abbey Road 1963-1966
Billy J Kramer & The Dakotas
Abbey Road 1963-1966
Genres: Pop, Rock, Classic Rock
 
  •  Track Listings (28) - Disc #1

1998 EMI release featuring 28 tracks digitally transfered at24 bits resolution, processed using Sonic Solutions NoNoise technology and mastered to 16 bit for CD using Prism SNS Noise Shaping. Includes hits, B-sides, rare t...  more »

     
?

Larger Image

CD Details

All Artists: Billy J Kramer & The Dakotas
Title: Abbey Road 1963-1966
Members Wishing: 4
Total Copies: 0
Label: EMI Europe Generic
Release Date: 3/16/1998
Album Type: Import
Genres: Pop, Rock, Classic Rock
Styles: Oldies, British Invasion
Number of Discs: 1
SwapaCD Credits: 1
UPCs: 724349345126, 766484361029, 632427186625

Synopsis

Album Description
1998 EMI release featuring 28 tracks digitally transfered at24 bits resolution, processed using Sonic Solutions NoNoise technology and mastered to 16 bit for CD using Prism SNS Noise Shaping. Includes hits, B-sides, rare tracks and the previously unreleased tunes 'Down In The Boondocks' and 'Listen'.
 

CD Reviews

A few stellar songs, twangy guitars, smooth baritone voice
Phil Rogers | Ann Arbor, Michigan | 06/18/2003
(4 out of 5 stars)

"You top 10 reviewers who probably can't sing a note - please give the Beatles' manager Brian Epstein more credit, and give the rest of us a break. Just because the songs the Beatles "threw away" to Peter and Gordon and Billy J. Kramer were not suitable for the Fab 4 doesn't mean they were bad songs, or that the so-called "Beatles spinoffs" didn't do them better than the Beatles themselves could have. We've been hearing this puke from rock journalists for three decades; I wish they'd all just grow up. Though the truth be told, no one could beat the Beatles at what they did, they themselves wouldn't have beaten the other Merseybeat groups who gave life to those types of songs the Beatles might have flubbed on. Outstanding as they were, the Beatles' particular performing style didn't match what was needed in certain musical situations. I like the Beatles better than probably any other pop-rock band I've ever heard, and as well as any of the later 'visionary' bands from the late 60's and beyond. Sure I'm still enough in awe of them that I feel somewhat weird about even attempting to review one of their albums. That's because I myself cannot stand knee-jerk, marbles-in-the-mouth journalist/critics, and can't tolerate the thought of me becoming one of them. The very idea is nauseating. This one top 10 reviewer didn't say one good thing about BJK yet gave the CD a rating of 4 stars. This strikes me as being mightily confused, like maybe while he was mentally composing his text he was simultaneously mooning himself in the mirror.Billy J. Kramer and the Dakotas first big stateside single, "Little Children" (Doc Pomus), wasn't a Lennon-McCartney tune. But it's the one that sounds the most like the Beatles, with the twanging guitar chords and the close harmonies, which coincidentally also sound like one of the Beatles' forebears and heroes, the Everly Brothers. Sure, the story portrayed by the lyrics is a little cutesy, but the Beatles themselves hadn't started evolving out of their teen idol phase, and the absolutely incredible early Rolling Stones singles didn't start denting the U. S. charts until 2-3 months later. [The Stones' began to split open the music world in mid-late summer with their rollicking remake of Buddy Holly's "Not Fade Away", followed closely and passionately by one of rock's greatest underrated songs ["Tell Me"]. They then proceeded to stun listeners even more with a groundbreaking song - "It's All Over Now"]. That one later formed the basis of at least two new styles, acid rock and hard rock. (My 14-year old psyche was barely ready for the honest, tough but tuneful sound of "Tell Me", but somehow I quickly fessed up and loved it entirely. It still took years for me to totally come to terms with "It's All Over Now", but after all, it was light years ahead of its time.) Though the early Beatles were sugar coated compared with early Stones, the undeniable passion of their earliest singles prepared us for the rawer power of "Tell Me", the Animals' "House of the Rising Sun", as well as the early Kinks and Zombies singles. For me, everything else hard and heavy kind of progressed easily from this, until the first time I heard "Purple Haze" booming through the dorm room walls, propelled from out of my neighbor's 4 x 3½ foot speakers. That was more or less the third and final rock revolution (at least for me).]But I digress mightily. "Bad to Me" (Lennon-McCartney) Billy J's second big U. S. hit, was more in the grain of songs like "P. S. I Love You". But it was a little lightweight for Lennon and Harrison to wrap themselves around. One reviewer stated that Garry Lewis and the Playboys founded their sound on things like it. Even if this is accurate (which I doubt) Lewis and Company sanitized their own sound by eliminating the twang and therefore most if not all of its character. As I stated before, BJK & the D's sounded a whole lot more like a Merseybeat version of the Everly Brothers than like GL & the P's. That Mersey bounce, heard frequently in the mid-to-quick tempo tunes of Peter and Gordon, Chad and Jeremy, Gerry and the Pacemakers, as well as the Searchers, at the time served them (and us!) very well. No matter how you slice it, Merseybeat does not map to Garry Lewis's unsyncopated, proto-bubblegum yum."Trains and Boats and Plains" (Bacharach and David) awhile before Dionne Warwick's version. Kramer's rather low-key but full voice, mixed with the Dakotas trademark twangy guitar, and orchestral strings, and as is [more often than not] usual for him - no backup singers. The way he gets the Mersey bounce into a slow ballad takes good breath control - very tricky to pull of, and he does it soulfully. On this song he's smoother sounding than a Johnny Cash or Marty Robbins . . . same vocal range, somewhat similar timbre . . . different singing style. The really nice thing about this collection is that it contains all BJK's singles that I remember from the radio, even when he/they were foundering ("It's Gotta Last Forever"). I never heard his/their first single [until I got their greatest hit collection in the 80's] as the Beatles own superior version quickly and completely eclipsed it ("Do You Want to Know a Secret?"). And it's tough to gauge whether Chad and Jeremy's version of "From a Window" is better, though I think so (Ch & J's two-part harmonies maybe give them the edge). And Billy J's voice on "I'll Keep you Satisfied" sounds a little bit like a bop version of someone like Matt Monro, or even a less grainy version of Rick Nelson. All in all, his voice is in no way lightweight. But his emergence was ill timed - a year and a half or three before - he might have gone gold all over the place."
The best of Merseybeat singer Billy J. Kramer
Lawrance M. Bernabo | The Zenith City, Duluth, Minnesota | 05/24/2003
(4 out of 5 stars)

"Billy J. Kramer (born Billy Ashton) was a minor singer but became part of the British Invasion because he happened to have the same manager as the Beatles, namely Brian Epstein. Consequently, Kramer got the change to record several Lennon & McCartney compositions during the first half of the period when he was recording "At Abbey Road: 1963-1966." The result was a short-lived music career of a singer who was an enjoyable example of the Merseybeat sound. This 2001 release collects the best of the songs that Billy J. Kramer recorded with his back up band the Dakotas, including his best Beatles covers, "Do You Want to Know a Secret," "I Call Your Name," and one of his two Top 10 hits on this side of the Pond, "Bad to Me." The other unofficial Beatles songs were "I'll Keep You Satisfied," "From a Window," and "I'll Be One My Way." "Little Children" was Kraemer's other Top 10 American hit, and the other standout songs are "Sugar Babe" and "Trains and Boats and Planes."Obviously the main attraction for this album is to have recordings of some early Lennon & McCartney compositions that were deemed unworthy of being recorded by the Beatles. The argument is never going to be that the Beatles should have saved these melodic but light-weight songs for themselves, but it is interesting to hear what John & Paul were writing that was being rejected by George Martin. Certainly McCartney was giving better songs to the British pop duo Peter & Gordon. Still, even if you do not know who is writing these songs there is something rather enjoyable about Kramer's singing. He was a lightweight pop singer to be sure, but that is what the Merseybeat sound was all about and he is certainly representative of the genre."
Pleasant memories with this fine CD.
Michael P. Lentz | Columbus, Ohio | 11/12/2009
(5 out of 5 stars)

"This group always seemed to come under the radar, as they were overshadowed by the Beatles, etc. I'm really glad I bought this collection. Their music was upbeat & I like just about all the cuts included here. Their versions of "Trains & Boats & Planes" & "Under the Boardwalk" are really fine & "Bad to Me" will have you humming all day. This whole album makes you hum. Billy J. Kramer & the Dakotas played well together & for their time in the sun, they sure made good tunes. If you remember them on "Shindig" & thus you're a baby boomer, you'll appreciate this collection."