The very name of
the Dead 60s telegraphs the aesthetic of the Liverpudlian quartet -- they's sick of living in the shadow of '60s
rock & roll culture, they want to tear down those giants and create their own icons. It's a sentiment not far removed from
Joe Strummer's exhortation of "No Elvis, Beatles, and the Rolling Stones in 1977!," but he sang that
in 1977, before
Elvis died, seven years after the
Beatles breakup, and when "Jumpin' Jack Flash" wasn't even ten years old.
The Dead 60s released their eponymous debut album in 2005 -- nearly 30 years after
the Clash released their debut. But where
the Clash preached revolution,
the Dead 60s practice tradition, using the
punk of the late '70s as a sacred text, never daring to deviate from what was done before. They may synthesize, though: often, the band sounds like
Joe Jackson fronting
the Clash or
the Specials, as they alternate between strident three-chord anthems and elastic
dub-inspired
punk-
reggae. It's an appealing sound and the band is not only tight, but they're reasonably good songwriters, too, on both the rockers and spooky, spacy
reggae. Nevertheless, the entire enterprise seems a little too tasteful and respectful, as if the group were so concerned with getting it right, they're reluctant to let loose. Plus, there's that nagging question of how does a band whose very name tears down one era of rock get away with fetishizing another time from the distant past -- it makes it seem as if
the Dead 60s are living in the past instead of moving forward, and their album, as enjoyable as it is, doesn't dispel that notion. It's kind of like listening to
the Stray Cats in 1982 -- they recreated the glory days of
Carl Perkins and
Gene Vincent, keeping
rockabilly alive 26 years after its heyday.
The Dead 60s do the same thing with
punk, but there's not only a greater distance between them and
punk than there was between
the Stray Cats and
rockabilly, they lack the energy and knowing sense of humor that gave
Brian Setzer's trio life and hit singles.
The Dead 60s are good musicians and show promise here -- their basic sound is good, even if it is heavily indebted to
punk and
ska revival -- but they're too enamored with the past to be truly memorable. ~ Stephen Thomas Erlewine, All Music Guide
