Search - Bela Bartok, Georg Solti, Chicago Symphony Orchestra :: Béla Bartók: Concerto for Orchestra; Dance Suite; Music for Strings, Percussion and Celeste

Béla Bartók: Concerto for Orchestra; Dance Suite; Music for Strings, Percussion and Celeste
Bela Bartok, Georg Solti, Chicago Symphony Orchestra
Béla Bartók: Concerto for Orchestra; Dance Suite; Music for Strings, Percussion and Celeste
Genre: Classical
 
  •  Track Listings (15) - Disc #1


     
?

Larger Image

CD Details

All Artists: Bela Bartok, Georg Solti, Chicago Symphony Orchestra
Title: Béla Bartók: Concerto for Orchestra; Dance Suite; Music for Strings, Percussion and Celeste
Members Wishing: 0
Total Copies: 0
Label: Decca
Original Release Date: 1/1/2007
Re-Release Date: 1/9/2007
Album Type: Original recording remastered
Genre: Classical
Styles: Forms & Genres, Concertos, Historical Periods, Modern, 20th, & 21st Century, Symphonies
Number of Discs: 1
SwapaCD Credits: 1
UPC: 028947577119
 

CD Reviews

Which Solti to choose in Bartok?
Santa Fe Listener | Santa Fe, NM USA | 04/27/2007
(4 out of 5 stars)

"This remastered digital collection from Chicago features two works that Solti recorded decades before in London, the Bartok Concerto for Orchestra and the Dance Suite. Both CDs contain a third work, the Music for Strings, Percussion and Celestra from Chicago and the Miraculous Mandarin Suite from London. Since these are all acclaimed recordings and Solti's Bartok was one of his strongest composers, I thought a side-by-side listen would be helpful.



Sound: Decca set out to produce sonic spectaculars in both cases, and in both cases succeeded. The earlier analog sound from London is miked closer and is free of digital edginess. The new remastering of the Chicago recordings has successfully removed the sting form the original CD issue, and though the CSO sits farther back, the sound has great visceral impact. Let's give a slight edge to Chicago.



Execution: You might assume, especially after reading the reviews at Amazon, that the CSO plays so spectacularly that there is no comparison with the London Sym. But Solti was both a powerhouse and a technician. I can't hear that much difference, except that the LSO's wonderful precision of attack isn't quite the super-precision of the CSO, especially in the violins. On the other hand, the LSO soloists play with more personalaity. Call it a draw.



Interprettion: Solti's Bartok was always fast, fierce, precise, and a tad clinical. Not for him the looser phrasing and warmer tone of Ivan Fischer. Having set his interpretation in place, Solti didn't change his timing or phrasing except by indignificant degrees. These two Concertos for Orchestra have an identical approach. However, the Dance Suite form London is hair-raisingly exciting, which isn't true of the Chicago version. And the Miraculous Mandarin Suite from London is even more thrillingly brutal; Solti gives this music the shock treatment, to great effect. By comparison, his MFSP&C from chicago is decidely lackluster.



In the end, it's the couplings that sell me on the London collection. For sheer excitment, Solti's earlier Dance Suite and Miraculous Mandarin qualify as two of his best recordings. As for the main attraction, both versions of the Concerto for Orchestra come out essentially equal."
Doesn't get any better than this!!!
R. N. Shagam | Albuquerque, NM USA | 11/30/2007
(5 out of 5 stars)

"OK, I'm a bit prejudiced because my former hometown band (as Rachel Barton calls it) is the CSO and I have some personal connections to it. But this recording is certainly up there with all the others--you can't go wrong."